Standalone Dehumidifiers Are Not Inefficient: An Engineer’s Take on Grow Room HVACD

Ian Atkins, P.E. discusses the misconception that grow room standalone dehumidifiers are inefficient, outlining the various assumptions that put this misconception into perspective. In this technical analysis of grow room HVACD approaches, he details relationships between coil performances, cooling/dehumidification modes, RH setpoints, and more.
February 15, 2022

Ian Atkins, P.E.The following piece provides a technical insight into HVAC technologies relevant to controlled environment agriculture (CEA). This was written by Surna Cultivation Technologies’ Ian Atkins, P.E. Mr. Atkins is a licensed engineer who specializes in HVACD system design for cannabis grow rooms. 

Mr. Atkins will be joining a panel discussing “HVAC – What’s Right For Your Grow” on March 1, 2022 at Indoor Ag-Con Las Vegas.

The Myth About Dehumidifiers

You may have at one point heard that dehumidifiers are inefficient because they add heat to the grow room, which then must be removed by the cooling system.

It is true that dehumidifiers add heat to a grow room when they run. And this heat from the dehumidifiers increases the heat load in the room that needs to be removed by the air conditioning system (AC).

But, it’s not true that using dehumidifiers in combination with a “decoupled” cooling system is inefficient compared to the alternative of reheat in an “integrated” system; even reheat that is “free” from hot gas reheat or heat recovery chillers.

The topic of whether integrated systems are more efficient can easily spiral out of control. It can turn into an endless cycle of energy modeling of specific pieces of equipment or systems.

I’ve realized that there is a simple way to look at these two types of systems in general. My assertion is that the combined energy removed from cooling coils in decoupled systems via standalone dehumidifiers and a separate cooling system is actually equal to the energy removed from a cooling coil in an integrated system, with an assumption* about the cooling coils. See figure below.

integrated air handler vs. decoupled AC and dehumidifier

And, if the same amount of BTUs are removed from cooling coils in both system types, and the efficiency of producing the cooling effect on the coils is also the same (the EERs), then so is electrical energy use.

Defining the Assumptions

The major assumption about the cooling coils to make my assertion true, is that the cooling coils have equal sensible heat ratio (SHR) at equal entering air conditions. The cooling coils being the coils that cool and dehumidify in the integrated system, inside the dehumidifier, and in the cooling system used with the standalone dehumidifiers.

This assumption means that for each BTU removed by each cooling coil, the same amount of moisture is removed.

For example, if the coil SHR is 0.75 at a given entering temperature and RH, then for each BTU removed the cooling coils, 0.75 BTU of sensible energy and 0.25 BTU of latent energy (moisture) is removed.

The equality shown in the figure above, that the total cooling coil energy removal is equal in both system types, is true over the grow cycle.

Cooling and Dehumidification Modes

For the sake of this topic, grow rooms and the cooling and dehumidification systems serving them have two modes: cooling mode and dehumidification mode.

Cooling mode is where the heat load from the lights drives the air conditioner to run and the AC removes enough moisture as a byproduct of cooling to satisfy the RH setpoint (though may need humidification to keep the RH up). This mode occurs when the room sensible heat ratio is greater than or equal to the sensible heat ratio of the air conditioner, usually when the lights are on with relatively small plants and a higher T/RH setpoint (e.g. lights on in a early veg room).

Dehumidification mode occurs when the room sensible heat ratio is less than the sensible heat ratio of the cooling coil. This is always the case during lights off and usually the case during mid and late flower with the lights on as well. Either reheat or additional dehumidifiers are needed to further dehumidify beyond what is removed as a byproduct of cooling.

So when the system is in cooling mode because the latent load is low and the lights are on, the dehumidifiers aren’t running or adding load, and the neither is the reheat coil, so both cooling systems remove the same heat load from the lights. That is, the dehumidifier cooling coil removal is zero, and the integrated system cooling coil removal is equal to the AC cooling coil removal in a decoupled system.

cooling mode no reheat or dehumidifiers running

But, when the latent load is high and the cooling system does not maintain RH below setpoint as a byproduct of removing the heat load, then an integrated system uses reheat and a decoupled system uses dehumidifiers to further lower the room RH. I like to say that in this condition the latent load is driving. The latent load is driving the system to run harder that it would need to to just remove the heat load.

Latent Load and SHR

The diagram below shows why the total cooling coil removal is the same between systems when the latent load is driving. The room latent load (moisture produced by plants) needs to be met, and if all coils have the same SHR, then the total cooling coil removal is the same between systems to remove the latent load.

dehumidification mode no reheat or dehumidifiers running

So for example, if the latent load is 1 MBH and the SHR of the cooling coil is 0.25 at the given room T/RH, the integrated system cooling coil needs to remove 4 MBH to remove the 1 MBH of latent load. To remove the latent load in the room with decoupled AC and dehumidifiers, the cooling coils in the AC and dehumidifier combined have to remove the same total BTUs as the integrated system cooling coil. In the case of a 1 MBH latent load and SHRs of 0.25 for the AC and standalone dehu cooling coils, the cooling coils of the AC and dehu combined need to remove 4 MBH. Depending on the ratio of sensible and latent loads to be removed, the decoupled system will have more AC or more dehumidifier(s) running. But as long as the SHR is consistent across coils, the total cooling coil removal will 4 MBH.

Considering Energy

Since both systems will have to remove the same total BTUs from cooling coils, assuming the same overall efficiency in removing BTUs from the cooling coil, or EER, then the systems would also have the same electrical energy use to remove the heat from the cooling coils for cooling and dehumidification. And if the energy use is the same in both cooling mode and dehumidification mode, and the room will be in either of these modes during the grow cycle, then both systems will have the same energy use over the grow cycle.

Reheat energy is a separate topic. But on the topic of dehumidifiers vs reheat, dehumidifiers are free reheat, hot gas reheat, heat recovery machines. Dehumidifiers add heat to the room. But only when an analogous integrated system would also be adding reheat. So heat from dehumidifiers isn’t extra heat, it just helps the AC pull out more moisture. Integrated reheat systems can use hot gas reheat or heat recovery chillers, but gas or electric reheat will use extra energy for reheat beyond the compressor energy used by ACs and dehumidifiers.


My point here is not that decoupled systems are better than integrated systems. There are many good integrated systems available for grow rooms helping to condition successful facilities.

As a category though, there is no inherent inefficiency in systems with standalone dehumidifiers. Both integrated air handlers with reheat and standalone dehumidifiers operate with similar constraints and options available. Both can use different airflows and coil temps to maximize latent heat ratio and both can use the same various technologies to enhance dehumidification efficiency, such as heat pipe, wraparound air-to-air heat exchangers, and desiccant.

There are definitely good reasons to opt for integrated/reheat systems over standalone dehumidifiers, but efficiency isn’t necessarily one of them.

Contact Us

Ready to get started or learn more about how we can help your facility succeed? Fill out the form and a company representative will be in touch.

Area of Support*


Featured Articles

Challenges of Indoor Cannabis Grows vs. Sun-Grown Cannabis

Cannabis has a long history, once frowned upon and illegal, but now widely accepted. Indoor cultivation is prevalent, despite support for legalization and outdoor cultivation in 21 US states.

Is Indoor Cultivation Difficult?

Indoor cultivation requires precise control of artificial environments for successful leafy greens and cannabis growth. Facilities, lighting, and automation play crucial roles. Discover the pitfalls many growers find out too late.

Optimizing Cooling Efficiency: Exploring the Benefits of the 4-Pipe Chilled Water System

Discover the benefits of the 4-pipe chilled water system for optimizing cooling efficiency and maximizing energy savings in this informative guide.

Interview with Brandy Keen: Emerging from the Indoor Growing Dark Ages

In this episode of the Cannabis Equipment News Podcast, Brandy Keen, co-founder and senior technical advisor of Surna Cultivation Technologies, discusses her nearly 17 years of industry experience helping some 800 cultivators.

Dodging Downtime [Case Study]

TruGro turned to Surna to provide a grow room HVAC solution that was efficient and would keep them running reliably for years to come.

4 Ways to Maximize Grow Room Square Footage

Staying competitive means maximizing your available grow room space. Cannabis cultivators and indoor food producers who can increase yields without sacrificing product quality or adding square footage are on the path to increased ROI. Here are 4 ways you can maximize your commercial grow space.
Sign up to receive blogs and other news


© 2023 Surna. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top
commercial indoor farm considerations and setup examples